Challenge 1
Supply chain attacks.
Nation-state actors exploit supply chain vulnerabilities to reach operational systems.

Control for critical infrastructure
State-sponsored actors, hacktivists and criminal organisations increasingly target essential services. Software controls alone struggle to address these persistent, sophisticated threats.
As featured in




The challenge
Sovereign infrastructure demands sovereign data control. If your most critical data can be reached from the internet, software layers in front of it are all that stand in the way.
Critical data paths and recovery copies held in secured Firevault Bunkers.
Critical operations require sign-off from multiple authorised parties across different roles.
Automated compliance logging that can help support NIS2 Article 21 and NCSC CAF outcomes.
Challenge 1
Nation-state actors exploit supply chain vulnerabilities to reach operational systems.

Challenge 2
Shared network paths between IT and OT create cascading vulnerabilities.
Answered byMulti-party authorisationChallenge 3
Legacy systems lack basic cybersecurity and cannot be easily patched.

The scenario
The air gap was assumed to be real. It was a firewall rule, and when it failed, everything behind it was exposed. Step through it, or play it through.
Step 1 of 2
A state-sponsored group compromises a regional energy provider through a supply-chain update to SCADA management software, then moves laterally for 47 days, mapping grid topology and exfiltrating operational procedures.
When they trigger the payload, substations across three counties lose supervisory control at once. Recovery takes 11 days because backup configurations were stored on network-attached storage, also compromised.
Step 2 of 2
With Control, SCADA configurations and grid topology data sit in physically disconnected vaults that require multi-party authorisation.
Network reachability, the attack vector, is not there.
An illustrative scenario.
Where each module sits
Critical infrastructure operators carry a corporate estate, an OT core that runs the mission, a vendor zone that supports the kit and remote field sites that report into it. Control puts a real boundary at every step.
Capabilities
Six things Control gives the team, from the first boundary to the audit afterwards.
Critical infrastructure
Critical data paths and recovery copies held in secured Firevault Bunkers.
Critical infrastructure
Critical operations require sign-off from multiple authorised parties across different roles.
Critical infrastructure
Automated compliance logging that can help support NIS2 Article 21 and NCSC CAF outcomes.
Critical infrastructure
Out-of-band management via dedicated cellular connectivity keeps control plane access available.
Critical infrastructure
Every access, transfer and policy decision is recorded.
Critical infrastructure
Verified control-plane baselines allow the network to be returned to a known-good operating state.
Adoption guide
Four steps, piloted on one site before it extends across the estate.
Map your infrastructure against NIS2 Article 21 and NCSC CAF outcomes.
Select and configure Control modules for your sector: energy, water, transport or defence.
Deploy in an isolated CNI environment with multi-party authorisation and tamper-evident logging.
Full deployment across critical infrastructure, with verified safe-state restoration.
Explore more
Questions
It can help support them. Physical zone boundaries, multi-party authorisation and automated logging give evidence against NIS2 Article 21 and NCSC CAF outcomes.
In secured Firevault Bunkers. For security, we do not publish Bunker locations.
Critical operations need sign-off from more than one authorised person in different roles, so no single credential can make the change alone.
Configurations and recovery copies held in physically disconnected vaults sit outside the compromised network, and verified baselines support a return to a known-good state.

Walk through your blueprint with the Firevault team and scope a proof of concept on your estate. 30 minutes, no sales pitch.